Skip to content
Taiwa no FumenPractical methods for shared thinking

English edition: the full translation has not yet received an independent line-by-line review. Check the linked sources and method-specific limits before use. Japanese PDFs and videos remain labelled.

Return to session-plan results

Schools, education and youth participation

Develop Student Ideas into a Next Step

Develop students' ideas across several tables, add ideas silently, and select priority ideas to check.

People
12–20
Session time
180 minutes
Format
In person

English session plan

Original program status: draft. Source safety category: Medium; this is not a guarantee of safety.

Preparation: More preparation. Facilitation team: Four roles, including someone with facilitation experience.

What this session can decide

Decide ideas for additional checking and proposed owners. Refer adoption, budgets, and grading to the school's formal procedures.

Outside its scope

  • Do not assess the people who propose ideas.
  • Do not decide adoption through a popularity vote alone.
  • Do not link participation to grades.

Primary caution: Do not assess the people who propose ideas.

Before starting

Question and scope
Develop students' ideas across several tables, add ideas silently, and select priority ideas to check. Before starting, state the subject and time period in one sentence.
What this session decides
Decide ideas for additional checking and proposed owners. Refer adoption, budgets, and grading to the school's formal procedures.
Output recipient
The Recorder stores the final priority ideas, ties, and questions to check, showing ideas to investigate next and the reasons.
Participation and information boundaries
Explain the choices to pass, take a break, or leave. Keep personal information, confidential information, and attribute-based evaluation off the record surface. Assign Participant support separately.
Operating roles
Assign Lead facilitator, Recorder, Timekeeper, and Participant support before starting, and confirm who announces switching and stopping.
Next review
Set a review date, viewers, and the person responsible for the next decision on the priority ideas, ties, and questions to check.

Who takes responsibility

Lead facilitator

Keep Develop Student Ideas into a Next Step within its purpose and exclusions, and announce the start and end of each stage.

From before the start through the end

Recorder

Link records to each table's theme and question: record ideas, expectations, and concerns by table; improved ideas and new options; and priority ideas, ties, and questions to check at each stage, then hand them to the recipient at the end.

From preparing record surfaces before the start through storage after the end

Timekeeper

Notify the Lead facilitator 3 minutes before each stage ends and when switching to breaks or buffer time.

At the start of every stage and 3 minutes before its end

Participant support

Receive requests to pass, take a break, leave, or check individually, and decide with the Lead facilitator whether resumption is possible.

From before the start through the end

Session flow

Minutes are measured from the session start. Method time, transition time, breaks and buffer are shown separately; they are not additional overlapping activities.

  1. 0–93 minutes

    Develop ideas by moving around the questions

    Method: Rotating Table Dialogue · 0–90 minutes. Transition: 90–93 minutes (3 minutes).

    As a programme-specific adaptation, display a theme-specific question at each table. The purpose of rotation is to add expectations and concerns to each theme's ideas from different perspectives. Participants rotate tables, adding ideas, expectations, and concerns. Respect earlier records and retain differing views without overwriting them. Retain the options to participate without moving or to pass.

    Responsible: Lead facilitator; Recorder; Participant support

    Output: Ideas, expectations, and concerns by table

    Handoff: Pass each table's ideas, expectations, and concerns to the silent addition work with that table's theme and question.

    This stage may be shortened only in accordance with the stated conditions.

  2. 93–116 minutes

    Add improvements without speaking

    Method: Silent Brainstorming / Brainwriting · 93–113 minutes. Transition: 113–116 minutes (3 minutes).

    Read the table records and write improvements, combinations, or alternatives, one per card. Even when similar content is bundled, keep differing reasons separate.

    Responsible: Lead facilitator; Recorder; Participant support

    Output: Improved ideas and new options

    Handoff: Pass comparable idea cards to ranking.

    This stage is not marked as shortenable.

  3. 126–149 minutes

    Choose ideas to check

    Method: Ranking · 126–146 minutes. Transition: 146–149 minutes (3 minutes).

    Order idea cards by contribution to learning, safety, and feasibility. Do not force resolution of missing information or ties; record additional checks.

    Responsible: Lead facilitator; Recorder; Participant support

    Output: Priority ideas, ties, and questions to check

    Handoff: Pass ideas, rankings, and questions to check to student representatives and the responsible school authority.

    This stage is not marked as shortenable.

What is retained and who receives it

Ideas, expectations, and concerns by table

Owner: Recorder

Develop ideas informed by multiple perspectives.

Improved ideas and new options

Owner: Recorder

Fill gaps without being influenced by how much people speak.

Priority ideas, ties, and questions to check

Owner: Recorder

Show ideas to investigate next and the reasons.

Materials and setup

Material names, quantities, groups and handling instructions retain the fixed draft's original helper-derived guidance. Where a format is marked “Source material specification”, the entire bound English source material entry takes precedence over the old helper-derived format guidance. This format-only correction does not resolve other instruction or safety concerns. English names are not substituted into a Japanese-keyed lookup.

Everyday tools

Broad-tip pens

Quantity: 3 per table

Format: Dark broad-tip pens or whiteboard markers

Check that ink flows and place them within participants' reach. Avoid pale-coloured pens.

Selection marks

Quantity: 2 marks per person

Format: Pen marks. Use round stickers only if anonymity or movement is needed.

Use pen marks by default. Divide round stickers by participant count only if repositioning or anonymous collection is needed.

Writing implements

Quantity: 1 per person

Format: Dark broad-tip pens or whiteboard markers

Check that ink flows and place them within participants' reach. Avoid pale-coloured pens.

Broad-tip pens

Quantity: 2 per group

Format: Dark broad-tip pens or whiteboard markers

Check that ink flows and place them within participants' reach. Avoid pale-coloured pens.

Sheets to prepare by hand

Theme-specific table question cards (programme-specific adaptation)

Quantity: 1 per table

Format: A4 copy paper

Write each table's theme and its question in one large sentence, with the table number at the top right. Do not make the question identical across all tables. Add: During rotation, add expectations and concerns to this theme's ideas from different perspectives. Do not include leading examples or proper names. This is a programme-specific adaptation, not the preparation sheet for the reference method's common question.

Homemade table paper without source diagrams

Quantity: 1 per table

Format: Two A4 sheets placed side by side; join with masking tape if more space is needed

Write Homemade table paper without source diagrams at the top, followed by the table number, theme, and that table's question. Provide separate spaces for Ideas, Expectations, and Concerns. Leave enough space for sticky notes or paper pieces not to overlap, and use lettering readable from a distance for whole-group sharing. Do not erase earlier records; retain differing views alongside them.

Cards for choosing participation methods

Quantity: 1 set per person

Format: 5 paper pieces cut from A4 copy paper

Write Move, Stay in place, Speak, Draw, and Pass on this activity on separate cards, making one set per person.

Idea cards

Quantity: 5 per person

Format: Sticky notes about 75 × 75 mm, or A4 copy paper cut into 4 pieces

Do not buy specialised cards. Write “Idea” at the top of each paper slip. If participants write on them, use one item per slip and handwrite the necessary headings before the session starts. Write only one idea per slip.

Surface for grouping anonymous ideas by similar subjects and effects

Quantity: 1 per group plus 1 for whole-group consolidation

Format: Source material specification: Classification sheets: one A3 sheet per group plus one for whole-group consolidation

Source-bound format display correction; the other fixed helper-derived guidance is unchanged.

Write the session question at the top. Initially spread out all submitted ideas without sorting them. After grouping similar ideas, label each group so its subject and action are clear. At the bottom, create an area for retaining the top 2 groups with the most selection marks.

Option cards

Quantity: 1 set per group; at most 12 items

Format: Sticky notes about 75 × 75 mm, or A4 copy paper cut into 4 pieces

Do not buy a special product; write Option at the top of paper pieces. If participants fill them in, use one item per card and handwrite needed headings before starting.

Ranking-criterion cards

Quantity: 1 per group

Format: Sticky notes about 75 × 75 mm, or A4 copy paper cut into 4 pieces

Do not buy a special product; write Ranking criterion at the top of paper pieces. If participants fill them in, use one item per card and handwrite needed headings before starting.

Table separating option ranks and held decisions

Quantity: 1 per group

Format: Two A4 sheets placed side by side; join with masking tape if more space is needed

Divide the work surface into 4 fields: Final order, Ties, Judgement deferred, and Mandatory conditions not met. Write headings in text rather than relying only on colour.

Information to gather before the session

Information sheet for checking safety and record handling on the day

Quantity: 1 sheet for the whole group

Format: A4 copy paper or viewing data with the same content

Use language a first-time reader can understand to explain Safety lead, Backup lead, Contact on the day, To whom records may be passed and to what extent, and Support contact. Add the creation date, the person who checked it, and a contact for questions. If distributing it, also prepare a large-print version or viewing file with the same content.

Materials chosen for the session conditions

Personal notes and envelopes for separating sensitive information from shared surfaces

Quantity: 1 sheet and 1 envelope per person

Format: 1 A4 sheet and 1 available opaque envelope

Give each person a blank note sheet. Do not write a personal name or content on the envelope. Let the person choose to take it away or hand it over sealed to a staff member identified by name.

Silent-submission tray

Quantity: 1 per group

Format: An opaque envelope or empty box already available, or a submission area marked out with masking tape on a table

Position it so other participants cannot read submitted content. There is no need to buy a dedicated tray.

Setup for each method

Rotating Table Dialogue

  1. Display the question, confidentiality scope, movement order for three rounds, stationary participation, passing and record readers.
  2. Do not put sensitive information on shared table sheets. Display that each person uses only one dedicated note and chooses whether to take it home or hand it in an envelope to one named responsible person.
  3. Display the safety lead and backup, same-day contact method, record recipients and handover scope, and the procedure for collecting and shredding paper mistakenly written on a shared surface.

Silent Brainstorming / Brainwriting

  1. Groups of 3–6, with group sizes differing by no more than one person
  2. One worktable per group, arranged so that participants do not look at one another’s writing
  3. One tray per group, opened only after all ideas have been submitted
  4. One whole-group consolidation surface for the groups’ top ideas

Ranking

  1. A table where all cards can be moved into one line or a leading group

When to switch or stop

Fallbacks

At 60 minutes from the start, when 30 minutes remain in the rotating-table dialogue, the second round is still unfinished.

Everyone chooses only one table they have not yet visited for a final rotation.

Method guide: Rotating Table Dialogue

Stop conditions

Students' ideas or statements are used for grades, conduct, or educational/career-path appraisal.
Stop use of the records and prohibit use outside the stated purpose.
An idea is treated as adopted despite unresolved safety, legal, or personal-information issues.
Return it to a candidate for checking and refer it for formal review.

Sources, rights and limits

This site has composed this programme's purpose, connections between methods, facilitation, roles, outputs, and switching conditions. See each method's individual page for its sources and licence.

Original source records and their required notices are retained below. Their presence does not mean a new legal or cultural-safety clearance. Original citation titles are kept in their source language.

Sources and required notices for the 3 methods used

Rotating Table Dialogue

  • Source: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Gender Equality World Cafe Practice Guide: PDF part 1 World Cafe basics | https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/ikusei/kyoudou/detail/1367502.htm | Adaptation under CC-BY-2.1-JP; changes made
  • Source: CC-BY-2.1-JP terms | https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/1351168.htm | CC-BY-2.1-JP
  • Attribution: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team | This site's text and diagrams
  • Cultural caution: This manifest contains no structured cultural-safety assessment. A person checks context, the option to decline participation, and power differences.
  • Limits of this record: Only the notices displayed in the public YAML were transcribed. No claim is made that individual rights do not exist.

Silent Brainstorming / Brainwriting

  • Source: Chris Baynham Hughes: Silent Brainstorming / Brainwriting | https://openpracticelibrary.com/practice/silent-brainstorming-brainwriting/ | CC BY 4.0 adaptation; changes made
  • Source: CC BY 4.0 | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • Attribution: Chris Baynham Hughes | Authors and contributors credited in the source material
  • Attribution: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team | Japanese adaptation and this site's own diagrams
  • Changes and adaptation: Adapted as a Japanese facilitation score; changes made
  • Cultural caution: open-method screening complete: No closed, ritual, or sacred cultural practice is used as a source; declining participation, sensitive information, and power differences are addressed in each method's limits and branches.
  • Limits of this record: Individual contributors are credited. Text covered by CC BY 4.0 was adapted with changes into Japanese facilitation scores. Exception notices, the site logo and third-party embedded material were excluded.

Current-page credit and licence companion for this method

Ranking

  • Source: Seeds for Change Facilitation Tools: Ranking | https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/tools | anti-copyright adaptation; changes made
  • Source: Conditions for applying anti-copyright | https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/resources | anti-copyright
  • Attribution: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team | This site's text and diagrams
  • Cultural caution: This manifest contains no structured cultural-safety assessment. A person checks context, the option to decline participation, and power differences.
  • Limits of this record: Only the notices displayed in the public YAML were transcribed. No claim is made that individual rights do not exist.

Confirmed programme clarification

The user confirmed the current programme text and programme-specific material instructions. Original methods, quantities, timing and print diagrams are unchanged. Earlier fixed notes are retained below as historical notes; they are not removed or treated as independently resolved. User confirmation of programme wording is distinct from independent acceptance of its English translation, rendered screens, rights and release checks.

Historical fixed-draft notes

The original fixed draft notes are retained without deletion as historical records of those fixed source versions. Current material format corrections are separately identified above; these notes do not imply that other concerns have been resolved.

  • Catalogue practice places questions by theme, while the preparation instruction says to use the same question at all tables. The source does not map these arrangements; neither instruction has been replaced.
  • The fallback says less than 30 minutes remain without specifying whether the end means the rotating-table stage or the whole programme. The translation keeps that scope unspecified.

Japanese resources and historical source records

Original Japanese plan and its print view · Japanese operation pack or starter materials

An English print edition is not provided here. The linked plans, print views and operation materials are Japanese resources.

Historical recorded publication holds

The following original hold statements are retained verbatim with their fixed source versions. They are not a statement of current acceptance, nor does this historical label resolve a source-specific restriction.

  • English translation and rendered-page independent acceptance pending
  • Method dependency source/text SHA binding and current source-specific rights verification pending
  • Publication not cleared
Historical fixed-source and English-draft provenance

Japanese program SHA-256: a324a9dac05c8757c9af6e3b88cdac5ddbd4100fb201d9c5e153d16b86568ced

Fixed source context SHA-256: 0030cae6476f881de740607517038b372c33d65d015ddc1dd5dbdd8d0431c886

English draft SHA-256: 1c8008e37028eef9645d9a1fb55a91f3270fb46f690228986c0d53ab50c3ae99

  • mext-rotating-table-dialogue: source 1b509a37f23157ca77584be8ea01aef2b6fda918f181a84e4b9ede5a63fed921; English draft 89fe90e2bf312897e0f7fa1bbb6bd44ed904fa0a18be3079eccb016a3a1c42fb
  • opl-silent-brainwriting: source 76227c2ee6759998ab5a1966783f4ceae088325918b57bf440e7619ce8e84574; English draft 029d6328baa0f8a108bd739a4f74d534254472192fd84e44df885aa91984fa82
  • seeds-card-ranking: source d57164cccee23b180db85ae49fe90bda72c5a9d7cbe8ca210683d8b398f6b77a; English draft 17bbde5f623d1feab9bad9c45c3dcf72685657cc97b84d41af7f8d1a3e4f60f6

These hashes identify the checked inputs; they do not grant independent acceptance or publication clearance.