Skip to content
Taiwa no FumenPractical methods for shared thinking

English edition: the full translation has not yet received an independent line-by-line review. Check the linked sources and method-specific limits before use. Japanese PDFs and videos remain labelled.

Return to method results

Method guide · Progress through phases

Rapid Value Stream Mapping

Use when a team needs a shared picture of actual work, waiting and dependencies, especially across remote work.

People
4–15
Base procedure time
120 minutes
Recording
Shared record

Purpose: Reflect and learn; Make a decision.

English guide

Text acceptance is not approval of this rendered page, its media, or publication.

How this method works

Arrange the flow of work chronologically on sticky notes to make the locations of delays visible. Use when the work flow, waiting and dependencies are described only through each owner’s impressions, and remote colleagues who cannot easily meet in person cannot share where work is held up. Arrange actual activities chronologically. Quantify only work times and waiting times that can be verified from records; keep unverified estimates based on impressions separate. The output is a flow diagram showing actual work, waiting times and the bottleneck to verify in this session. Determine causes and implement countermeasures elsewhere. Do not use this on its own where there are no measurable time records, or where causes will be determined solely in this session.

Phase schedule

Minutes are cumulative from the start of the base plan, not a live timer. Read scaling for any additional time. Phase controls do not advance automatically.

  1. Narrow the flow0–14 minutes from the start (14 minutes)

    Action: Narrow. Participation: Everyone.

    Recording not separately specified for this phase

  2. Arrange activities14–38 minutes from the start (24 minutes)

    Action: Arrange. Participation: Everyone.

    Individual record

  3. Record times38–67 minutes from the start (29 minutes)

    Action: Record. Participation: Everyone.

    Shared record

  4. Overlay friction67–102 minutes from the start (35 minutes)

    Action: Overlay. Participation: Everyone.

    Shared record

  5. Select the bottleneck to verify102–120 minutes from the start (18 minutes)

    Action: Select. Participation: Everyone.

    Shared record

Facilitation steps

  1. For 14 minutes, narrow the scope to one flow close to the outcome you want to improve, and agree its start and end points together.
  2. For 24 minutes, work backwards from the point at which the customer receives the output, arranging each actual activity on one sticky note containing a verb.
  3. For 29 minutes, record the modal work time and waiting time for activities with existing records. Calculate the waiting-time ratio only for activities for which both times have been verified.
  4. For 35 minutes, overlay marks showing the accuracy of handovers of responsibility, tools and output quality, and places where the work is especially draining.
  5. For 18 minutes, select one bottleneck that can be verified from records and agree to check the others next time.

If something changes

If

After 3 minutes of scope discussion, 2 or more proposals for start and end points remain.

Then

Narrow the scope to only the immediately preceding segment, and show the outside areas only as boundaries.

If

More than half of the activities have no numerical values available during time recording.

Then

Record only the shortest-to-longest range, explicitly mark the representative value as unverified, and exclude those activities from the waiting-time ratio calculation.

If

After 4 minutes, 2 or more candidate bottlenecks remain and no single one has been chosen for this session.

Then

Choose the one for which the most existing records can be checked; do not identify it as the cause.

Preparation

Materials

  • One shared whiteboard or sheet of large-format paper, at least 200 cm wide
  • Sticky notes for activities: about 15 per person, 75 × 75 mm
  • Sticky notes in another colour for delays and friction: about 30 for the whole group
  • Dark markers: one per person

Room and setup

  • Set up one shared surface everyone can write on at once: a wall at least 200 cm wide or a large table
  • One digital board with screen sharing if there are remote participants

Adjust for people and time

With fewer than 4 people, the necessary role perspectives are missing and waiting or dependencies may be overlooked. For 4–15 people, everyone writes on one shared surface; do not split into small groups. With more than 10 people, split the flow into earlier and later segments. Have the people most familiar with each segment write first, then bring the whole group together. With 16 or more people, use separate sessions of no more than 15 people each.

Safety and non-applicable situations

Keep unverified impressions separate from record-based times. Use only activities with verified work and waiting times in the ratio. Do not determine causes or execute countermeasures in this session, or use it on its own without measurable time records.

Manuscript's recorded references

These translate the original manuscript's source and rights claims. They remain separate from any current-page notice below; they do not establish new verification.

Current-page licence notice

A Taiwa no Fumen adaptation based on the Open Practice Library practice identified below. The manuscript's recorded references and the source page checked for this notice are shown separately.

Changes: explanations, timings, instructions, materials and branches were edited for this site. The English edition translates that Japanese manuscript; it is not a verbatim translation of the original practice.

The checked source footer names CC BY 4.0 but links to CC BY-SA 4.0. The official site source code contains the same mismatch. This has not been confirmed with the rights holders. This notice does not change the terms of the original material.

This site's contributions to the identified adaptation and English translation are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0. Credit the creators, identify the source and licence, indicate changes, and share adaptations under the same terms. This does not remove separate source terms or third-party rights.

This is not a blanket licence for the whole site, other original manuscripts, third-party photographs, logos, external templates or trademarks. The source's Except where noted qualification remains applicable.

Names are used descriptively to identify the source. No endorsement or approval by Open Practice Library or its contributors is implied.

See the linked legal code for its no-warranty and other provisions.

The additional contributor names are handles from the fixed official practice source. They are not inferred real names or a reconstruction of collapsed editor labels. The earlier attribution limits remain recorded.

Credits on the checked source page

  • Named contributors on the source page: Steve Pereira
  • Contributors listed in the official practice source (repository handles): @stevepereira

Source page checked on 2026-10-17: Rapid Value Stream Mapping.

Source lineage

    CC BY-SA 4.0 — this site's adaptation and translation contributions · Legal code · Official source policy

    This material-specific notice does not itself establish publication clearance. Preserved manuscript references above remain separate from the current page's credits and licence evidence.

    Diagram, print, and video language

    Original Japanese guide, diagram, and print view. Their labels and print text have not been translated; an English print edition is not provided here.

    English video-library navigation. Original Japanese audio, subtitles and transcripts remain labelled Japanese resources. Their translations are separate later work. No remote player is embedded here.

    The manual English phase controls are a navigation aid, not a live facilitation timer. Interactive diagram motion remains pending.

    Editorial provenance

    Japanese source status and logs are provenance only. They do not mean this English text or interface was field-tested. Historical fixed-text acceptance and hold records remain specific to their recorded versions; displaying them neither asserts current acceptance nor resolves source-specific restrictions.