Method guide · Work with a structured grid
Generative Relationships STAR
Compare how people see four aspects of a relationship and choose a first action to improve it.
- People
- 4–40
- Base procedure time
- 90 minutes
- Recording
- Shared record
Purpose: Build working relationships; Reflect and learn.
English guide
Text acceptance is not approval of this rendered page, its media, or publication.
How this method works
A method for examining what a relationship produces through four axes and choosing a first step to change it. Each person places points on a chart for diversity, the degree of mutual attunement, the degree of joint action, and the reasons for working together. Small groups read the differences between the points, consider the results their combination produces, and look for actions to strengthen an axis that needs attention. Rather than arguing over which assessment is right, use the differences themselves as material. The result is a shared view of the relationship and a record of who will try what and when. Do not use it for performance appraisal or personnel evaluation, to judge relationship problems without the people involved, or where people fear retaliation.
Phase schedule
Minutes are cumulative from the start of the base plan, not a live timer. Read scaling for any additional time. Phase controls do not advance automatically.
Use the arrow keys, Home or End while these controls have focus. The complete phase schedule remains below, including without JavaScript.
- Draw the star0–10 minutes from the start (10 minutes)
Action: Draw. Participation: Everyone.
Recording not separately specified for this phase
- Assess four axes10–30 minutes from the start (20 minutes)
Action: Assess. Participation: Individually.
Individual record
- Read the differences30–50 minutes from the start (20 minutes)
Action: Read. Participation: Groups of 4–7.
Shared record
- Interpret the combination50–75 minutes from the start (25 minutes)
Action: Interpret. Participation: Groups of 4–7.
Shared record
- Choose a first step75–90 minutes from the start (15 minutes)
Action: Choose. Participation: Everyone.
Shared record
Facilitation steps
- For 10 minutes, read through the four axes: diversity, attunement, joint action, and reasons for working together. Confirm which team is being considered and that individual performance evaluation is outside this session's scope.
- For 20 minutes, each person marks a point on each of the four axes for diversity, attunement, joint action, and reasons for working together, then briefly writes their reasons.
- For 20 minutes, in groups of 4–7, place everyone's points on the shared relationship chart and take turns reading out where they are similar and where they are far apart.
- For 25 minutes, consider what results the current combination of points is producing, select one axis needing attention, and suggest improvements.
- For 15 minutes, agree as a whole group on at least one action to try first, and record who will take it, the deadline, and how you will reflect on it.
If something changes
If
On 3 occasions, someone describes another person's point on the shared chart as right or wrong.
Then
The facilitator stops the judgement and returns to hearing, briefly and one person at a time, the different experiences the points represent.
If
The group has discussed only one of the four axes for 20 minutes or more, leaving the other 3 unexamined.
Then
At each table, read through each unexamined axis, then allow 1 minute per axis for the next comparison.
If
In the final 10 minutes, proposed actions consist only of abstract terms and none has an owner and deadline.
Then
Reduce the proposal to one conversation, trial, or observation that would improve the chosen axis by one step, and name the person and date.
Preparation
Materials
- One A4 four-axis relationship chart per person
- One A3 four-axis relationship chart for sharing per table
- Four round stickers per person for marking points
- One writing implement per person
- One flip chart for whole-group sharing
Room and setup
- One table per group, with room for 4–7 people to gather around a shared relationship chart
- Display the meaning of the four axes where everyone can see it
- Explain that the assessment is for understanding the current relationship, not ranking people
Adjust for people and time
With 4–7 people, use individual and shared charts at one table. With 8–40, also use 4–7 people per table, making group sizes differ by no more than 1 person. In whole-group sharing, each table reports only the one axis it selected. Even when comparing two departments, do not make their results compete; select actions separately from each department's chart. If participants need anonymity, do not collect their individual charts and limit sharing to what they communicate orally.
Safety and non-applicable situations
Use differences in assessment as material, not as judgements about who is right or better. Do not use the method for personnel evaluation, to judge absent people's relationship problems, or where retaliation is a concern. When anonymity is needed, do not collect individual charts and share only within the participants' oral contributions.
Manuscript's recorded references
These translate the original manuscript's source and rights claims. They remain separate from any current-page notice below; they do not establish new verification.
- Liberating Structures Fieldbook (2026) — Henri Lipmanowicz; Keith McCandless; Nancy White
https://www.liberatingstructures.com/generative-relationships-star
Adaptation under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes made
- Creative Commons License — Liberating Structures
https://www.liberatingstructures.com/cc-license
CC-BY-SA-4.0 notice
- CC BY-SA 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Licence text
Current-page licence notice
This explanation is an adaptation for Taiwa no Fumen based on the official Liberating Structures page linked below. The manuscript's recorded references are listed separately from the web page checked on 17 October 2026.
Changes: the Japanese explanation and facilitation plan have been edited for Taiwa no Fumen. The English edition translates that Japanese manuscript; it is not a verbatim translation of the official page.
The LS-adapted text on this page, including this site's editorial and translation contributions, is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0. When reusing it, credit the creators, identify the source and licence, indicate changes, and follow the licence's ShareAlike terms when sharing adaptations.
This site's notation diagrams and on-screen illustrations explain the facilitation process. They are not presented as official LS icons.
Method names are used to identify their sources. This is not an official LS website, and no endorsement or approval by the creators or rights holders is implied.
This notice does not grant blanket permission to reuse third-party photographs, logos or linked materials. Trademark, personality and other rights are addressed separately.
Materials created before June 2026 may carry different terms. Check the terms attached to an older item before reusing it.
To the extent permitted by law, the source materials and adaptations are provided without warranties. See the legal code for details.
Credits on the checked source page
- Developed by: Brenda Zimmerman
- Adapted by: Henri Lipmanowicz, Keith McCandless
Related work credited on that page: Brenda Zimmerman; Plexus Institute.
Source page checked on 2026-10-17: Generative Relationships STAR.
Source lineage
- Original repertoire (2013): Henri Lipmanowicz, Keith McCandless
- 2026 Fieldbook: Keith McCandless, Nancy White
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International · Legal code · Official source policy
This material-specific notice does not itself establish publication clearance. Preserved manuscript references above remain separate from the current page's credits and licence evidence.
Diagram, print, and video language
Original Japanese guide, diagram, and print view. Their labels and print text have not been translated; an English print edition is not provided here.
English video-library navigation. Original Japanese audio, subtitles and transcripts remain labelled Japanese resources. Their translations are separate later work. No remote player is embedded here.
The manual English phase controls are a navigation aid, not a live facilitation timer. Interactive diagram motion remains pending.
Editorial provenance
Japanese source status and logs are provenance only. They do not mean this English text or interface was field-tested. Historical fixed-text acceptance and hold records remain specific to their recorded versions; displaying them neither asserts current acceptance nor resolves source-specific restrictions.
Original source log (Japanese)
2026-07-24 · Recorded participant count: 1
2026-07-24の受入宣言に基づく一括記録(15手法)。個別セッションの実測値ではない。